TDEE Calculator for Bodybuilding
Enter your age, sex, height, weight and activity level to estimate total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), then pick a goal. A lean bulk adds about 10–15% to maintenance; a cut removes about 10–20%.
Runs in your browser; nothing you type is stored or sent. Estimates only, not medical advice. Updated .
Calculate your calories and macros
Body-fat % is optional. If you enter it, the calculator uses the lean-mass Cunningham equation instead of Mifflin-St Jeor.
Calories for each goal
Macro split for your goal
| Macro | Grams | Calories | % of total |
|---|
On this page
What TDEE actually means
Total daily energy expenditure is everything your body spends in twenty-four hours. It breaks into four parts, and understanding the split explains why two people of the same weight can need very different calorie intakes.
The largest piece is your basal metabolic rate, the energy needed to keep your heart beating, your brain running and your tissue repaired while you do nothing at all. For most lifters this is somewhere between sixty and seventy percent of the total. Next comes the thermic effect of food, roughly ten percent, which is the cost of digesting and absorbing what you eat. Protein carries the highest thermic cost of the three macronutrients, which is one of several reasons a higher protein intake helps during a cut.
The third piece is the energy your training actually burns. This is almost always smaller than people expect. A hard hour of lifting might cost three to four hundred calories, which a single post-workout snack can erase. The fourth piece, non-exercise activity thermogenesis, covers walking, standing, fidgeting and every unplanned movement. It varies enormously between individuals and it is the single biggest reason prediction equations miss.
The formulas this calculator uses
By default the calculator uses the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, which a systematic review for the American Dietetic Association found to be the most accurate predictive equation for resting metabolic rate in healthy non-obese and obese adults (Frankenfield et al., 2005).
Men: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age + 5
Women: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age − 161
With body-fat %: BMR = 500 + 22 × lean body mass (kg) (Cunningham, 1980)
TDEE = BMR × activity multiplier
Why offer Cunningham? Equations based on total bodyweight cannot tell muscle from fat. In recreational athletes, the Cunningham lean-mass equation predicted resting energy expenditure well, while Mifflin-St Jeor was accurate for fewer than half of the participants (ten Haaf & Weijs, 2014). It only helps if your body-fat estimate is reasonable, so leave the field blank if you are guessing.

A worked example
A 28-year-old man weighing 180 lb (81.6 kg) at 70 inches (178 cm) who trains four days a week (moderate, ×1.55).
BMR = (10 × 81.6) + (6.25 × 178) − (5 × 28) + 5 = 1,793.5 kcal. TDEE = 1,793.5 × 1.55 ≈ 2,780 kcal per day.
| Goal | Multiplier | Daily target |
|---|---|---|
| Maintain | ×1.00 | 2,780 kcal |
| Slow lean bulk | ×1.10 | 3,060 kcal |
| Lean bulk | ×1.15 | 3,200 kcal |
| Slow cut | ×0.90 | 2,500 kcal |
| Cut | ×0.80 | 2,220 kcal |
Rounded to the nearest 10 kcal. Two weeks of weigh-ins will tell you more than the equation.
How to adjust from the estimate
The number this tool gives you is a hypothesis. Here is how to test it.
Weigh yourself first thing in the morning, after using the bathroom, before eating or drinking. Do this every day for two weeks, then average each week. Daily weight swings of two to four pounds from water, sodium and glycogen are normal and mean nothing on their own; the weekly average is the signal.
If you are bulking and the weekly average is climbing by roughly a quarter to a half percent of bodyweight, you are in the right zone. Faster than that and you are adding more fat than you need to. If nothing moves after two full weeks, add about 150 calories per day and reassess.
If you are cutting and losing around half to one percent of bodyweight per week, hold steady. Losing faster than one percent per week, especially while lifting hard, raises the risk of shedding lean tissue alongside fat. If the scale stalls for two weeks, subtract about 150 calories or add daily steps rather than slashing intake aggressively.
How the macro split is built
Protein comes first and is set per kilogram of bodyweight: 1.8 g/kg for maintaining and bulking, and 2.2 g/kg for cutting, where extra protein helps protect lean mass (Morton et al., 2018; Helms et al., 2014). Fat is set at 27% of calories (25% on a cut), within the 15–30% range suggested for physique athletes. Carbohydrate fills the rest, fuelling hard training. The protein calculator explains the protein figure in more detail.
Where this estimate stops being useful
Prediction equations are built from population averages. Even the best of them miss individuals by a meaningful margin, so expect your real maintenance to differ from the estimate by a few hundred calories. Very muscular or very lean people, people coming off long diets, and anyone with a thyroid condition or medication that affects metabolism should expect larger errors. Treat the result as a starting point and correct it with two to three weeks of scale data.
Common questions
Is a TDEE calculator accurate?
It gives an estimate, not a measurement. Prediction equations typically land within about ten percent of measured resting energy expenditure for most people, but individual variation is real. Treat the output as a starting point and let two to three weeks of scale and training data refine it.
What is the difference between BMR and TDEE?
BMR is what your body burns at complete rest simply to stay alive. TDEE is BMR multiplied by an activity factor, so it includes training, walking, fidgeting and digestion. TDEE is the number you eat around; BMR is only an input to it.
How many calories should I add to bulk?
Roughly ten to fifteen percent above maintenance supports muscle gain while limiting fat gain, which for most lifters is around 250 to 400 calories per day. Larger surpluses add weight faster, but the extra weight skews heavily toward fat rather than muscle.
Why does this calculator give lower numbers than others?
Many tools apply generous activity multipliers. Research on free-living adults consistently shows people overestimate both training intensity and general daily movement. Conservative multipliers produce a starting estimate you are more likely to actually hit.
Should I eat the same calories on rest days?
For most people, yes. Keeping intake constant is simpler to follow and the weekly total is what drives body composition change. Cycling calories across the week can work, but it adds complexity without a clear advantage for the majority of lifters.
References
- Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, et al. (1990). A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51(2), 241–247. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- Frankenfield D, Roth-Yousey L, Compher C (2005). Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(5), 775–789. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- Cunningham JJ (1980). A reanalysis of the factors influencing basal metabolic rate in normal adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 33(11), 2372–2374. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- ten Haaf T, Weijs PJ (2014). Resting energy expenditure prediction in recreational athletes of 18–35 years: confirmation of Cunningham equation and an improved weight-based alternative. PLoS One, 9(9), e108460. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- Helms ER, Aragon AA, Fitschen PJ (2014). Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: Nutrition and supplementation. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11, 20. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- Iraki J, Fitschen P, Espinar S, Helms E (2019). Nutrition recommendations for bodybuilders in the off-season: A narrative review. Sports, 7(7), 154. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
- Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, et al. (2018). A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training–induced gains in muscle mass and strength. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(6), 376–384. PubMed (opens in a new tab)
Related guides
Other calculators
Calculator results are estimates for healthy adults and are not medical or dietary advice. See the full disclaimer.